Review




Structured Review

GraphPad Software Inc coefficient of determination test
a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the <t>coefficient</t> of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.
Coefficient Of Determination Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coefficient of determination test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coefficient of determination test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Tissue shear as a cue for aligning planar polarity in the developing Drosophila wing"

Article Title: Tissue shear as a cue for aligning planar polarity in the developing Drosophila wing

Journal: Nature Communications

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56744-7

a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the coefficient of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.
Figure Legend Snippet: a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the coefficient of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.

Techniques Used: Control, Two Tailed Test



Similar Products

90
GraphPad Software Inc coefficient of determination test
a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the <t>coefficient</t> of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.
Coefficient Of Determination Test, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coefficient of determination test/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coefficient of determination test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc coefficient of determination test (r2)
a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the <t>coefficient</t> of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.
Coefficient Of Determination Test (R2), supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coefficient of determination test (r2)/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coefficient of determination test (r2) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Darma Inc coefficient of determination test (r2) r-squared (r2)
a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the <t>coefficient</t> of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.
Coefficient Of Determination Test (R2) R Squared (R2), supplied by Darma Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/coefficient of determination test (r2) r-squared (r2)/product/Darma Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coefficient of determination test (r2) r-squared (r2) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ASHRAE Inc test method for the determination of window solar heat gain coefficient
a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the <t>coefficient</t> of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.
Test Method For The Determination Of Window Solar Heat Gain Coefficient, supplied by ASHRAE Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/test method for the determination of window solar heat gain coefficient/product/ASHRAE Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
test method for the determination of window solar heat gain coefficient - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the coefficient of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Tissue shear as a cue for aligning planar polarity in the developing Drosophila wing

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56744-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b , c Analysis of tissue flow patterns in ( a ) WT proximal and ( b ) WT distal regions and ( c ) distal dpy-RNAi wings (24–32 hAPF). Segmented and tracked cells at each time point were pseudo-coloured by rows ( y -axis of the image). Cell trajectories were monitored over 90–120 min, with arrows indicating cell flow velocity direction. Velocity profile plots depict average velocity per row. d Relative cell movement, where adjacent rows of cells move relative to each other, visualised with blue arrows indicating magnitude (length) and direction (orientation) of velocity. Tissue velocity x gradient measures the partial derivative of the velocity component in the x -direction with respect to the y -direction. e Temporal evolution of instantaneous velocity x gradients (24–26 hAPF) for WT proximal, WT distal, and dpy-RNAi wings. f Average tissue velocity x gradient in WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings at indicated time points. Blue: WT distal vs WT proximal *** P = 0.001, ** P = 0.0048; grey: WT distal vs dpy-RNAi ** P = 0.0082; purple: WT proximal vs d py-RNAi **** P < 0.0001. g Cartoon (top) depicts wing-hinge detachment from the blade at 20 hAPF (red dotted line). Confocal image (bottom) shows a severed wing at 32 hAPF. Analysis of tissue flow patterns in severed wings (28–32 hAPF). Cell trajectories in imaged region (red box) were monitored for 2 h, with velocity profile plots displaying the average velocity for each row of cells. h Average tissue velocity x gradients in control and severed wings across time points. * P = 0.0116. i Relative stable Fz amounts at horizontal and vertical junctions in control and severed wings at 32 hAPF. Dot indicates mean per wing. Paired t -test, two-tailed *** P = 0.0005. j Correlation between tissue velocity x gradient and relative stable Fz across genotypes (in different colours and shapes) and developmental time points (in different colour gradients). Dot represents averaged values from all wings per time point. R 2 indicates the coefficient of determination. The number of wings examined is indicated. Error bars are SEM. ( f ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing between WT proximal, WT distal and dpy-RNAi wings for each time point. ( h ) One-way ANOVA test, comparing control and severed wings for each time point. ns, not significant. Source data are provided in the file.

Article Snippet: In some experiments, coefficient of determination test ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}^{2}$$\end{document} R 2 ) was computed to determine how strong the linear relationship was between two variables using GraphPad Prism.

Techniques: Control, Two Tailed Test